🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial move to restrict social platforms access for young people below 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Politicians, safety advocates, and parents are observing with great interest to see if this approach will set a precedent for other nations.

Across Europe Trend

Throughout Europe, a increasing number of nations are exploring similar restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that mobile devices and platforms are "taking away our kids' childhood". The policy could be formalized soon.
• Norway is planning to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to shield young people from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media account holders. Authorities have stated that an Australian-model ban remains "a potential measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has asked the legislature to enact a law raising the access age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has recommended a comparable step, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Dutch government has advised guardians to prevent their children from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has passed a symbolic motion supporting a ban for minors unless parental consent is provided. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" design of these platforms, the step does not establish binding law.

"A clear age restriction is a solid starting point," said one European lawmaker supporting the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Approach

For the United Kingdom, the government has remained open to a potential ban, stating that "nothing is discarded" but stressing any policy must be "based on robust research".

Previously, momentum grew behind a proposal to impose limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately weakened. Instead, the administration vowed to further research the topic.

Advocacy groups have voiced concerns. An organization established by the loved ones of a young person who died after encountering dangerous social media material suggests that a blanket age ban might not make platforms safer and could result in a "cliff edge" of risk when young people reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the inability of the tech sector to create tools that are safe and age appropriate for minors," stated a leading peer.

The US: A State-by-State Approach

Stateside, regulation is primarily unfolding at the state level against a backdrop of country-wide inaction.

• Utah demands adult approval for under-18s to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a measure prohibiting under-14s from accessing social media, though it faces court battles.
• The state of Virginia has passed a rule restricting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with extra time requiring a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted measures requiring parental consent for under-16s to open social media profiles.

Even with bipartisan support and suggestions from various individuals to copy Australia's example, a US-wide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Perspectives

Apart from these regions, further nations are also taking action.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for under-16s effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the required age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, international organizations take a more cautious tone. Unicef has warned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "may even prove counterproductive". The organization highlights that social networks can be a "lifeline" for marginalized youth and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to invest in child safeguards.

Even as this global discussion continues, the policies of Australia and several other countries show that policymakers globally are increasingly content to stand by for the industry to make changes on their own.